How To Make Law To Change The Way Farm Animals Are Killed Each Day

Near the Regulation

The EU legislation on the killing of animals aims to minimise the pain and suffering of animals through the utilize of properly canonical stunning methods. It applies to farmed animals.

In 2009 the Union adopted Council Regulation (EC) N° 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the fourth dimension of killing which started to utilize on 1 Jan 2013.

Post-obit a favourable opinion of the European Food Safety Dominance on low atmospheric pressure level system for the stunning of broiler chickens (chickens kept for meat production) Annexes I and Two to Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 take been amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (European union) 2018/723 every bit regards the approving of low atmospheric pressure stunning.

The Regulation in half-dozen questions and answers

one. What is new in this regulation?

Eu legislation to protect animals at the time of killing already existed (Directive 93/119/EC) just was outdated in many respects. The new regulation contains several important changes:

Information technology is a regulation:

• This ways that it is directly applicable and information technology facilitates a harmonised application in the European union.

Increased operator responsibility:

• Each operator has to know what they are doing through the use of a standard operating procedure. Such methodology is not new for slaughterhouses every bit it is already required and in place for nutrient safety (the then-called HACCP organization = Gamble Analysis Disquisitional Command Point). But information technology is new to require standardised procedures for animal welfare.
• Operators are required to evaluate the efficiency of their stunning method through animal based indicators. As a consequence, stunned animals have to be regularly monitored to ensure that they do not regain consciousness before slaughter.
• Each slaughterhouse has to appoint an Animal Welfare Officeholder who is accountable for implementing the animal welfare measures. This does not replace the official inspection and there is derogation for minor slaughterhouses.
• Furthermore, the regulation requires manufacturers of stunning equipment to provide instructions on the use of their equipment, on how to monitor their efficiency and go on them in order.

Training and research on animal welfare:

• The regulation requires staff handling animals in slaughterhouses to possess a certificate of competence regarding the welfare aspects of their tasks. The obtainment of the certificate is submitted to independent examination by bodies recognised by the competent dominance.
• The regulation also aims at scientific support beast welfare to provide technical assistance for officials working in slaughterhouses. Although at that place take been some research centres in many Member States, the results of their enquiry and their technical competence were not sufficiently available to official inspectors. As a event, inspectors had often difficulties in assessing complex stunning systems. The regulation remedies this of import result.

New requirements for killing for disease command purposes

• Culling animals on a large scale is sometimes the simply tool to control highly contagious diseases. As this affects public spending (and often the Spousal relationship budget), the regulation aims at making the competent potency performing such killing more accountable to the public regarding the welfare of the animals culled. In particular, the regulation provides for better planning, supervision and reporting. Use of animal welfare unfriendly methods of killing is no longer allowed except under infrequent circumstances (such every bit to protect human being health or in case of an uncontrollable animal disease).

Updated standards

• The regulation introduces many technical changes. For example, the scope of stunning or killing methods is more than strictly divers, and minimum electric parameters are provided.
• A number of technical changes concern the construction, layout and equipment of slaughterhouses such as the lairage facilities or the electrical stunning equipment.

2. Does the regulation bear upon all slaughtered animals in the EU?

No, but the large majority of them are covered.

The regulation concerns the killing of animals in slaughterhouses as well as those kept for farming purposes. This includes the killing of fur animals, of male day-erstwhile chicks (of laying hens breeds) or other killing taking place in farms. In particular it concerns the killing for affliction control purposes (every bit occurred, for example, in the Uk for the command of Human foot and Rima oris Disease).

Animals killed due to, or post-obit, scientific experiments are covered past a specific Directive.

Animals killed under other circumstances (hunting, bullfighting, stray dogs or cats in shelters, animals in the wild, etc.) are not part of the telescopic of this regulation. Those areas are covered by national legislation and Wedlock competences are either limited (hunting) or excluded.

3. How many animals are concerned?

(based on data collected earlier adoption in 2009)

Every year nearly 360 million pigs, sheep, goats and cattle equally well as several billion poultry are killed in European union slaughterhouses.

The European fur industry adds some other 25 1000000 animals to the figure.

Hatcheries impale effectually 330 millions twenty-four hour period-one-time-chicks.

The control of contagious diseases may besides require the killing of thousands to millions of animals.

4. Does this regulation apply for third countries? How?

Aye, but as before 2013.

The regulation requires slaughterhouses in tertiary countries exporting meat to the EU to comply with similar standards to those in the regulation. The standard of the World Arrangement for Animate being Health is taken into account when assessing equivalency between the standards implemented in third countries and the ones of the Community.

v. Does the regulation generate costs for companies? For Member States?

The Commission has performed an extensive bear upon assessment in lodge to evaluate the extent to which the measures envisaged in the initial proposal will affect companies and the Fellow member States.

This impact assessment is based on a specific socio-economic study carried out past an external consultant. In add-on, this initial Commission proposal has taken into consideration a large consultation of all stakeholders and has been designed to minimise the possible costs.

For example, the requirement to engage an Brute Welfare Officer is not obligatory for pocket-sized slaughterhouses as such a mensurate would non have been proportionate to the problem (proper coordination on animal welfare is not really an effect in a modest institution). Other measures have been granted a transitional period for implementation to allow operators or Member States to adapt progressively. This is the case for the standards applicative to the pattern and stock-still equipment of slaughterhouses and for the implementation of the certificate of competence applicative to staff in slaughterhouses.

However information technology should exist underlined that a number of measures were already applied by some companies (on a voluntary basis) or past some Member States (equally national legislation).

6. Does the regulation ban some stunning methods?

The regulation does not ban whatever major method of stunning presently in use. However, it limits the possibility to employ certain methods.

It does not ban the utilize of the waterbath stunner for poultry despite its welfare disadvantages.

The use of carbon dioxide is still permitted in certain cases despite the scientists' opinion on its aversiveness for animals. Still the use of carbon dioxide over 40% is not permitted for stunning poultry in slaughterhouses.

The reason for maintaining the possibility to use those methods of stunning is the lack of practical alternatives under certain weather.

In the case of the waterbath for poultry, alternatives exist (use of gas) but are soon not developed for the small-scale or medium size slaughterhouses, which represent a very of import number of establishments in Europe.

The regulation foresees that the Commission will present a report on the possible culling for stunning poultry at the latest four years after the entry into force of the regulation.

Similarly the utilize of carbon dioxide tin can't exist rejected at present equally there is no commercially viable culling for certain species like sus scrofa or fur animals. In add-on, it is a yet an important technique for the mass killing of poultry.

Educational materials

• 2018 Video on the protection of animals at slaughter (bachelor in 22 European union languages)

  

• 2018 Factsheets on the protection of animals at slaughter and on farm killing (bachelor in 22 EU languages)
• BTSF Online class: Animal Welfare at slaughter and killing for affliction control
• BTSF Online course: Animal Welfare at slaughter and killing for disease command for poultry
• 2012 Brochure: Animal Welfare Officeholder

Timeline - Contempo actions

March 2018: the Commission adopted a "Study to the European Parliament and the Quango on the possibility of introducing certain requirements regarding the protection of fish at the time of killing".

• Report [all languages]

Oct 2017: the Commission concluded a written report on the "Preparation of best practices on the protection of animals at the fourth dimension of killing".

• Report report [EN]

• Executive summary of the written report [EN] and FR

Oct 2017: the Committee ended a study on the "Welfare of farmed fish: Common practices during transport and slaughter".

• Written report written report [EN]

• Executive summary of the report [EN] and FR

8 February 2016: the Commission adopted a report on restraining bovine animals by inversion or whatsoever unnatural positions:

• Report

• Executive summary of the study

• Study restraining systems for bovine animals slaughtered without stunning, welfare and socio-economic implications (BOREST)

Related links

• Brexit: Observe to stakeholders of the United kingdom and European union rules on certificates of competence pursuant to the requirements of Regulation (EC) NO 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the fourth dimension of killing, to slaughterhouse operators
• Study on various stunning methods for poultry as requested in Article 27 (3) of this new Regulation
• Written report to provide information to consumers on the stunning of animals

Source: https://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/animal-welfare/animal-welfare-practice/slaughter-stunning_en

Posted by: williamsannot1974.blogspot.com

Share this post